Research connecting computing, power and thermal management

The rapid growth of AI workloads is driving unprecedented increases in data center power demand, current transients, and thermal stress, exposing fundamental limitations in traditional 48 V rack architectures, low-voltage AC distribution, and line-frequency transformer interfaces. This paper reviews the three stages of architectural shifts required to support next-generation AI data centers and identifies three enabling technological building blocks: high-voltage conversion-ratio DC/DC converters, facility-level low-voltage DC distribution, and medium-voltage solid-state transformers. The advantages, technical challenges, and potential solutions associated with each building block are reviewed. Finally, future research directions and open challenges are discussed.

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) has driven unprecedented growth in data center electricity demand. The scale and pace of this load growth carry significant implications for the sustainability of electric power systems. On the one hand, rapid, spatially concentrated data center load growth is outpacing clean energy deployment in several major regions, raising emissions and challenging both grid flexibility and reliability. On the other hand, this fast-developing and capital-intensive sector offers abundant opportunities to advance sustainability through clean energy integration and operational innovations. This article provides an overview of the mechanisms through which data center affect power system sustainability, underscoring both risks and the potential. Specifically, this article (i) characterizes AI data center load behavior and categorizes electricity supply configurations by function and sustainability profile, as well as situates these loads within global and regional electricity demand trends; (ii) analyzes sustainability impacts across short-run operational and long-run planning mechanisms, evaluates effects on grid carbon emissions and renewable energy utilization, and feasibility of offering system flexibility and participating in ancillary service; and (iii) evaluates real-world corporate sustainability pathways and highlighting both the system benefits and feasibility limits of current carbon accounting practices. The goal of this work is to synthesize existing knowledge and technological developments and to guide research and development toward a more sustainable integration of AI data centers and electric power systems.

We present a systematic performance and energy-efficiency characterization of five flagship scientific workloads on SuperMUC-NG phase 2, the 28 PetaFLOPs system at the Leibniz Supercomputing Center (LRZ) equipped with Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 (Ponte Vecchio, PVC) accelerators. The selected codes span molecular dynamics (gromacs, lammps), astrophysics and cosmology (OpenGadget3, AthenaK), and finite-element PDE solvers from the dealii-X Center of Excellence. For each code we measure throughput and energy efficiency expressed as compute-elements per wall-clock second (or per Joule of consumed energy) on a single compute node, comparing CPU-only (SPR) against combined CPU+GPU (SPR+PVC) configurations where available. Energy measurements rely on lightweight code instrumentation with p3em, or the Energy Aware Runtime (EAR) present on the system. Our results show that GPU offload yields $4-12\times$ higher throughput and up to $15\times$ better energy efficiency compared to CPU-only execution, with lammps and AthenaK benefiting most. However, both throughput and energy gains are sensitive to problem granularity: insufficient work per GPU tile erodes the accelerator advantage, as clearly observed in AthenaK at small mesh-block sizes. The power-budget utilization is systematically lower for CPUs than it is for GPUs, indicating that even at peak useful-work rate, most applications running on CPUs leave a significant fraction of the node's thermal envelope unused.

The rapid growth of large-scale AI workloads, particularly Large Language Model (LLM) training and inference, is fundamentally reshaping the operational dynamics of hyperscale data centers. Unlike traditional cloud workloads, AI-driven jobs exhibit bursty, high-intensity, and rapidly shifting resource demands, often leading to sudden capacity stress that cannot be effectively handled by reactive threshold-based mechanisms. In this paper, we propose a deployment-oriented, burst-aware early warning framework for proactive capacity stress prediction under AI workload surges. We formulate the problem as a high-recall forecasting task over multivariate telemetry windows, with the explicit goal of enabling operational intervention before system degradation occurs. The proposed framework integrates workload intensity, temporal variation, and system pressure signals, and employs a lightweight tree-based learning model to capture nonlinear interactions in highly imbalanced environments. To evaluate the system under realistic conditions, we introduce an AI workload surge injection methodology that simulates burst-driven demand patterns observed in large-scale AI systems. Our XGBoost-based model achieves an ROC AUC of 0.697 and an AP of 0.670, significantly outperforming baseline methods. Under deployment-oriented threshold selection, the framework achieves a Recall of 0.914, enabling the detection of the majority of stress-prone periods with acceptable false-alarm cost. Beyond predictive performance, we show how the proposed framework can be integrated into operational control loops to support proactive actions such as workload throttling and resource scaling. Our results highlight the practical value of high-recall, learning-based early warning systems in enabling resilient and adaptive data center operations in the era of AI-driven workloads.

The rapid growth of large language model (LLM) inference is creating significant data-center loads that face increasing energy-management challenges under tightening grid conditions and demand response (DR) requirements. Conventional data-center energy management mainly relies on temporal and spatial workload shifting and campus-level energy asset scheduling, but it usually treats LLM inference demand as an aggregate load. As a result, these approaches fail to exploit the internal characteristics of LLM serving and therefore overlook the flexibility offered by LLM-specific techniques such as model quantization. To unlock this flexibility, this paper proposes a quantization-enabled energy management framework for grid-responsive LLM inference data centers. First, a quantization-to-power model is established to map each model--quantization configuration to a compact set of dispatchable parameters. Second, a two-stage quantization-enabled DR model is developed to account for model instance switching, request routing, and precision selection. Third, a multi-campus co-optimization method is introduced for DR participation by integrating grid-side electricity and carbon signals with the quantization-enabled DR model. Case studies show that the proposed framework reduces total data-center operating cost by 34.3\% without curtailing served token volume, validating model quantization as an effective flexibility lever for grid-responsive LLM data-center energy management.

The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure is driving unprecedented growth in electricity demand from data centers. Traditional power-system planning treats large computing facilities as inflexible peak loads, leading to costly infrastructure upgrades and long delays in grid interconnection. Recent work has shown that AI clusters can reduce electricity consumption during peak demand through software-based workload orchestration. This article explores how modern GPU-based AI data centers can operate as grid-interactive assets that respond dynamically to power system conditions. We describe an architecture integrating grid signals, workload scheduling, and power telemetry for fine-grained cluster power control. Experimental results from a real-world deployment on a 130 kW GPU cluster demonstrate multiple forms of flexibility, including rapid load reduction, sustained curtailment, and carbon-aware operation while preserving service levels for priority jobs. We further demonstrate performance-aware load shifting across geographically distributed clusters, enabling workloads to migrate toward regions with lower grid stress. Together, these capabilities transform AI infrastructure from static electricity consumers into flexible resources that support grid reliability, accelerate interconnection, and improve computing sustainability.

This article addresses recent advances in artificial intelligence, which have set off an astounding race among technology frontiers to build large data centers. It provides insights into impacts of large data centers on the planning and operation of the power grid.

The rapid growth of AI workloads is substantially increasing data center electricity demand and carbon emissions, motivating the development of carbon-aware scheduling methods. However, effective scheduling is challenging because renewable generation and AI workloads are subject to forecast errors, while training and inference workloads exhibit heterogeneity in computational characteristics. This paper proposes a contextual robust optimization framework for AI data center operation. The proposed model explicitly captures the heterogeneous computational characteristics of AI training and inference workloads. To deal with renewable generation and workload forecast errors, we develop loss-based uncertainty learning models that directly map contextual features to covariate-dependent uncertainty sets. The resulting contextual joint chance-constrained scheduling problem is reformulated into a tractable robust optimization problem, and a calibration algorithm is developed to provide finite-sample probabilistic feasibility guarantees for multiple joint chance constraints. Numerical experiments based on real-world AI workload traces and renewable generation data show that the proposed method reduces operating costs by an average of 5.57% compared to benchmark methods while maintaining reliable feasibility and strong computational scalability.