Steady-State Equivalent Circuit Model for Data Center Loads
Published 2026-08-18 · arXiv · Credibility S
Planners currently represent data centers as aggregate constant-PQ or ZIP loads in steady-state interconnection and contingency studies. These aggregate models are computationally convenient. However, they obscure the electrical relationship between computational workloads, server utilization, and grid-side demand. They ignore the internal power-electronic conversion stages of IT loads and assume homogeneous workloa…
Abstract, interpretation and reference
Abstract
Planners currently represent data centers as aggregate constant-PQ or ZIP loads in steady-state interconnection and contingency studies. These aggregate models are computationally convenient. However, they obscure the electrical relationship between computational workloads, server utilization, and grid-side demand. They ignore the internal power-electronic conversion stages of IT loads and assume homogeneous workload distributions across the compute clusters. This hides operating-point-dependent converter losses and efficiency variations. We propose a steady-state equivalent-circuit model (ECM) for data centers, which explicitly builds circuit models for IT loads, power supply units, cooling, and auxiliary systems. For power supply units, the equivalent circuit model explicitly represents internal power-electronic conversion stages. For IT loads, we develop a utilization-dependent server power model, and we combine it with loss-aware ECMs of power supply units. This approach captures the grid-side impact of heterogeneous workload distributions while preserving compatibility with conventional power-flow analysis. We evaluate this data center ECM in large-scale transmission power flows, using Monte Carlo simulations under heterogeneous and homogeneous cluster utilization. In comparison with the fixed-efficiency constant-PQ model, the ECM predicts that the most stressed line exceeds its thermal limit in about 30% of Monte Carlo samples. The results further show that homogeneous server utilization overstates line-loading variability by 17%-46% relative to heterogeneous server utilization, depending on the intra-cluster workload correlation.