智算中心论文专站

AIDC Research Papers

Liquid Cooling AI Data Center Power & Thermal Systems
Current Issue

Volume 2026 · Issue 07-06

按期刊卷期页方式整理本期论文。每条仅使用日报已列出的可追溯公开来源,不新增未经核验事实。

Research ArticleAI 运维优化

Learning Burst-Aware Early Warning Models for Capacity Stress under AI Workload Surges in Hyperscale Data Centers

Zihan Yu、Xianling Zeng、Zhiming Xue、Yalun Qi、Sichen Zhao

Published 2026-06-19 · arXiv · Credibility S

The rapid growth of large-scale AI workloads, particularly Large Language Model (LLM) training and inference, is fundamentally reshaping the operational dynamics of hyperscale data centers. Unlike traditional cloud workloads, AI-driven jobs exhibit bursty, high-intensity, and rapidly shifting resource demands, often leading to sudden capacity stress that cannot be effectively handled by reactive threshold-based mech…

Abstract, interpretation and reference

Abstract

The rapid growth of large-scale AI workloads, particularly Large Language Model (LLM) training and inference, is fundamentally reshaping the operational dynamics of hyperscale data centers. Unlike traditional cloud workloads, AI-driven jobs exhibit bursty, high-intensity, and rapidly shifting resource demands, often leading to sudden capacity stress that cannot be effectively handled by reactive threshold-based mechanisms. In this paper, we propose a deployment-oriented, burst-aware early warning framework for proactive capacity stress prediction under AI workload surges. We formulate the problem as a high-recall forecasting task over multivariate telemetry windows, with the explicit goal of enabling operational intervention before system degradation occurs. The proposed framework integrates workload intensity, temporal variation, and system pressure signals, and employs a lightweight tree-based learning model to capture nonlinear interactions in highly imbalanced environments. To evaluate the system under realistic conditions, we introduce an AI workload surge injection methodology that simulates burst-driven demand patterns observed in large-scale AI systems. Our XGBoost-based model achieves an ROC AUC of 0.697 and an AP of 0.670, significantly outperforming baseline methods. Under deployment-oriented threshold selection, the framework achieves a Recall of 0.914, enabling the detection of the majority of stress-prone periods with acceptable false-alarm cost. Beyond predictive performance, we show how the proposed framework can be integrated into operational control loops to support proactive actions such as workload throttling and resource scaling. Our results highlight the practical value of high-recall, learning-based early warning systems in enabling resilient and adaptive data center operations in the era of AI-driven workloads.

中文解读

背景:AI 数据中心负载、功率密度和能源约束同步上升,AI 运维、负载预测和设施调优正在成为智算中心设计的关键变量。问题:论文聚焦现有方案在效率、可靠性或工程协同上的瓶颈。方法:摘要显示作者采用框架构建和频域/系统级分析,把运行负载、冷却/能源系统和基础设施约束放在同一分析框架中。结果:研究重点指向跨地域数据中心负载与电力资源之间的调度关系。意义:对日报读者而言,它可用于判断AI 工具是否能降低运维复杂度并提升可用性。仍需结合全文实验条件、样本范围和成本假设核验。

参考文献

Zihan Yu, Xianling Zeng, Zhiming Xue, 等. Learning Burst-Aware Early Warning Models for Capacity Stress under AI Workload Surges in Hyperscale Data Centers[J/OL]. (2026-06-19)[2026-07-06]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21130v1.

Full text 中文海报
AI 运维优化 论文图示
Research Article算电协同

Revisiting "Cooler is Better": ITD-Aware Per-CPU Thermal Optimization for Sustainable Data Center Operation

Jason Crop、Hayden Moore、Sudeep Pasricha

Published 2026-06-10 · arXiv · Credibility S

As data center energy demand approaches grid-level constraints, optimizing conventional server infrastructure is essential for sustainable growth. The long-standing assumption that "cooler is better", i.e., lower CPU temperatures reduce power, does not fully hold for modern low-voltage CPUs, where inverse temperature dependence (ITD) drives higher supply voltages at lower temperatures. This creates a non-monotonic p…

Abstract, interpretation and reference

Abstract

As data center energy demand approaches grid-level constraints, optimizing conventional server infrastructure is essential for sustainable growth. The long-standing assumption that "cooler is better", i.e., lower CPU temperatures reduce power, does not fully hold for modern low-voltage CPUs, where inverse temperature dependence (ITD) drives higher supply voltages at lower temperatures. This creates a non-monotonic performance-per-watt curve where efficiency peaks at an intermediate thermal point. In this paper, for the first time, we empirically characterize ITD on production Intel Xeon CPUs and demonstrate that efficiency-optimal temperatures are CPU part-specific, and frequently higher than typical data center operating conditions. Measurements from commercial cloud data center platforms (Amazon, Equinix) reveal that approximately half of modern high-power CPUs operate about 10°C below their efficiency-optimal thermal point. By implementing ITD-aware thermal grouping of CPUs and inlet temperature adjustments, data center operators can optimize facility-level cooling and overall sustainability. Our case study shows that this approach can reduce total data center energy by 4-13% without sacrificing performance or reliability.

中文解读

背景:AI 数据中心负载、功率密度和能源约束同步上升,算力负载与电网侧资源的协同调度正在成为智算中心设计的关键变量。问题:论文聚焦现有方案在效率、可靠性或工程协同上的瓶颈。方法:摘要显示作者采用建模优化、调度分析或算法评估,把运行负载、冷却/能源系统和基础设施约束放在同一分析框架中。结果:研究重点指向AI 负载波动对电网设备寿命和调频边界的影响。意义:对日报读者而言,它可用于判断智算中心建设是否受电网容量、负载波动和调度机制约束。仍需结合全文实验条件、样本范围和成本假设核验。

参考文献

Jason Crop, Hayden Moore, Sudeep Pasricha. Revisiting "Cooler is Better": ITD-Aware Per-CPU Thermal Optimization for Sustainable Data Center Operation[J/OL]. (2026-06-10)[2026-07-06]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11163v1.

Full text 中文海报
算电协同 论文图示
Research Article芯片与算力

WattGPU: Predicting Inference Power and Latency on Unseen GPUs and LLMs

Mauricio Fadel Argerich、Jonathan Fürst、Marta Patiño-Martínez

Published 2026-07-03 · arXiv · Credibility S

Large Language Model (LLM) inference workloads are a rapidly growing contributor to data center energy consumption. Optimizing these deployments requires matching specific LLMs to the most efficient GPUs, but operators currently lack the tools to do so without exhaustively profiling each combination. While some predictive models exist, they still require profiling data and struggle to generalize to hardware unseen d…

Abstract, interpretation and reference

Abstract

Large Language Model (LLM) inference workloads are a rapidly growing contributor to data center energy consumption. Optimizing these deployments requires matching specific LLMs to the most efficient GPUs, but operators currently lack the tools to do so without exhaustively profiling each combination. While some predictive models exist, they still require profiling data and struggle to generalize to hardware unseen during training. To address this, we introduce \textit{WattGPU}, featuring two predictive models for mean GPU power draw and Inter-Token Latency (ITL). Our approach leverages only publicly available LLM metadata and GPU specifications, eliminating the need for hardware access or profiling while enabling generalization to unseen NVIDIA server-grade GPUs and LLMs. We evaluate our models using rigorous leave-one-GPU-out and leave-one-LLM-out cross-validation on a dataset of 42 open-source LLMs (0.1B--27B parameters) and 8 GPUs under both offline and server scenarios. The mean power draw model achieves a median absolute percentage error of $\leq3.4\%$ for offline and $\leq13.5\%$ for server scenarios on unseen GPUs, while the latency model achieves $\leq8.5\%$ in server mode, both maintaining strong GPU ranking correlations for server scenarios (Kendall $τ\geq0.76$). Compared to standard physically grounded baselines -- Load-Scaled Thermal Design Power (TDP) for power draw and roofline for latency -- our models reduce median absolute percentage error by approximately 4$\times$ on unseen LLM-GPU combinations for server scenarios or approximately 2$\times$ for completely unseen GPUs. WattGPU's data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/maufadel/wattgpu.

中文解读

背景:AI 数据中心负载、功率密度和能源约束同步上升,芯片、服务器和高密度算力部署正在成为智算中心设计的关键变量。问题:论文聚焦现有方案在效率、可靠性或工程协同上的瓶颈。方法:摘要显示作者采用框架构建和频域/系统级分析,把运行负载、冷却/能源系统和基础设施约束放在同一分析框架中。结果:研究重点指向跨地域数据中心负载与电力资源之间的调度关系。意义:对日报读者而言,它可用于判断芯片路线和服务器密度变化如何传导到机房设计。仍需结合全文实验条件、样本范围和成本假设核验。

参考文献

Mauricio Fadel Argerich, Jonathan Fürst, Marta Patiño-Martínez. WattGPU: Predicting Inference Power and Latency on Unseen GPUs and LLMs[J/OL]. (2026-07-03)[2026-07-06]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02391v1.

Full text 中文海报
芯片与算力 论文图示
Research Article热管理与液冷

Financing Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure: Mapping AI Infrastructure Investment and Compute Governance Across Africa

Kai-Hsin Hung、Sumaya Nur Adan、Krupa Suchak、Armita Sadeghian Barzoki、Kofi Yeboah、Mohammad Amir Anwar

Published 2026-06-24 · arXiv · Credibility S

Artificial intelligence depends on large-scale compute resources and their supporting infrastructure. However, AI governance debates treat compute primarily as a technical input rather than as an outcome of investment, ownership, and financial control. This paper examines AI infrastructure investment flows across Africa through a systematic analysis of 46 publicly announced projects totalling USD $12.7 billion betwe…

Abstract, interpretation and reference

Abstract

Artificial intelligence depends on large-scale compute resources and their supporting infrastructure. However, AI governance debates treat compute primarily as a technical input rather than as an outcome of investment, ownership, and financial control. This paper examines AI infrastructure investment flows across Africa through a systematic analysis of 46 publicly announced projects totalling USD $12.7 billion between 2019 and 2025. Using a value chain framework, we analyze who invests in AI-relevant infrastructure and where investments concentrate. Our findings reveal a highly concentrated landscape dominated by global data center operators, hyperscale technology firms, and development finance institutions, clustering in South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, and Egypt. We introduce asymmetrical interdependence to describe a structural condition in which capital and physical infrastructure account for 73% of total funding while control remains concentrated in the compute layer among a small number of global technology firms. We argue that compute governance must account for capital flows, ownership, and control, not only geographic access, because these dynamics shape AI compute equity. Infrastructure presence is necessary but insufficient for meaningful governance capacity.

中文解读

背景:AI 数据中心负载、功率密度和能源约束同步上升,液冷、热管理和数据中心能效正在成为智算中心设计的关键变量。问题:论文聚焦现有方案在效率、可靠性或工程协同上的瓶颈。方法:摘要显示作者采用综述归纳和指标比较,把运行负载、冷却/能源系统和基础设施约束放在同一分析框架中。结果:研究重点指向能效评价口径、运营指标和优化目标的系统化梳理。意义:对日报读者而言,它可用于判断液冷方案、热管理路线和高密度部署节奏。仍需结合全文实验条件、样本范围和成本假设核验。

参考文献

Kai-Hsin Hung, Sumaya Nur Adan, Krupa Suchak, 等. Financing Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure: Mapping AI Infrastructure Investment and Compute Governance Across Africa[J/OL]. (2026-06-24)[2026-07-06]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28404v1.

Full text 中文海报
热管理与液冷 论文图示
Research ArticleAI 运维优化

Hot AI in Cold Space: Thermal-Crosstalk-Aware Scheduling for Sustainable Orbital AI Clusters

Shuyi Chen、Zhengchang Hua、Nikos Tziritas、Georgios Theodoropoulos

Published 2026-06-23 · arXiv · Credibility S

Terrestrial AI training faces an unsustainable energy and water crisis, positioning Orbital Data Centers (ODCs) as a "zero operational carbon" alternative. However, the sub-$10μ\text{s}$ communication latency required for synchronized scientific workloads, such as distributed Large Language Model (LLM) training, forces ODCs into extreme physical density, triggering a critical "Proximity-Thermal Paradox." As these hi…

Abstract, interpretation and reference

Abstract

Terrestrial AI training faces an unsustainable energy and water crisis, positioning Orbital Data Centers (ODCs) as a "zero operational carbon" alternative. However, the sub-$10μ\text{s}$ communication latency required for synchronized scientific workloads, such as distributed Large Language Model (LLM) training, forces ODCs into extreme physical density, triggering a critical "Proximity-Thermal Paradox." As these high-density systems scale into Monolithic Structures or Proximity Swarms, they suffer from intense thermal-fluid crosstalk (heat traps in shared cooling loops) and thermal-radiative crosstalk (mutual heating that blocks deep-space cooling radiators). If left unmitigated, this persistent heat stagnation not only triggers severe thermal throttling that degrades training throughput, but also induces severe thermal fatigue, drastically shortening hardware lifespans and generating premature space e-waste. To make orbital AI truly sustainable, this position paper challenges traditional uniform load-sharing. We propose the Thermal-Aware Heterogeneity Thesis, which treats spatial cooling variances as a primary resource management dimension. Building on this, we introduce Thermal-Load Balancing (TLB), a software framework that dynamically migrates these intensive workloads to the coolest available units based on instantaneous fluid temperatures or absorbed radiation. Our analysis demonstrates that TLB resolves thermal bottlenecks to restore Model Flops Utilization (MFU), while simultaneously reducing physical thermal stress. Extending the operational lifespan of orbital hardware is crucial to amortize the massive embodied carbon of rocket launches, outlining a necessary pathway to scale orbital AI without accelerating e-waste.

中文解读

背景:AI 数据中心负载、功率密度和能源约束同步上升,AI 运维、负载预测和设施调优正在成为智算中心设计的关键变量。问题:论文聚焦现有方案在效率、可靠性或工程协同上的瓶颈。方法:摘要显示作者采用建模优化、调度分析或算法评估,把运行负载、冷却/能源系统和基础设施约束放在同一分析框架中。结果:研究重点指向AI 负载波动对电网设备寿命和调频边界的影响。意义:对日报读者而言,它可用于判断AI 工具是否能降低运维复杂度并提升可用性。仍需结合全文实验条件、样本范围和成本假设核验。

参考文献

Shuyi Chen, Zhengchang Hua, Nikos Tziritas, 等. Hot AI in Cold Space: Thermal-Crosstalk-Aware Scheduling for Sustainable Orbital AI Clusters[J/OL]. (2026-06-23)[2026-07-06]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26150v2.

Full text 中文海报
AI 运维优化 论文图示
Research Article算电协同

Grid-Interactive Thermal Management of AI Data Centers via Contextual Distributionally Robust Optimization

Jiachen Shen、Jian Shi、Yijie Yang、Chenye Wu、Dan Wang、Ju Bin Song、Zhu Han

Published 2026-07-01 · arXiv · Credibility S

Thermal management in AI data centers is increasingly challenged by bursty workloads and uncertain heat generation. To prevent thermal violations, existing cooling strategies either enforce conservative, rigid bounds that severely limit grid responsiveness, or rely on forecast-driven controllers that perform poorly under AI workload uncertainty and distribution shifts. To overcome the above challenges, this paper pr…

Abstract, interpretation and reference

Abstract

Thermal management in AI data centers is increasingly challenged by bursty workloads and uncertain heat generation. To prevent thermal violations, existing cooling strategies either enforce conservative, rigid bounds that severely limit grid responsiveness, or rely on forecast-driven controllers that perform poorly under AI workload uncertainty and distribution shifts. To overcome the above challenges, this paper proposes a Contextual Distributionally Robust Optimization (CDRO) framework for grid-interactive cooling control. Unlike standard DRO with fixed ambiguity sets, the proposed approach dynamically adapts the Wasserstein radius using real-time AI and grid context. This safely shrinks uncertainty bounds during stable regimes, unlocking deep demand-side flexibility. Theoretically, we formulate the control as an infinite-dimensional inf-sup problem, derive an exact tractable reformulation for the Wasserstein worst-case expected-cost term, and then derive a tractable conservative deterministic counterpart for the Distributionally Robust Conditional Value at Risk (DR-CVaR) thermal safety constraint. Solved via a scalable nested Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) algorithm, the CDRO controller achieves near-zero thermal violations under extreme workload spikes in high-fidelity EnergyPlus co-simulations. Simultaneously, it reduces the operational cost premium of robustness by approximately 13.7 percentage points relative to standard Min-Max Model Predictive Control (MPC).

中文解读

背景:AI 数据中心负载、功率密度和能源约束同步上升,算力负载与电网侧资源的协同调度正在成为智算中心设计的关键变量。问题:论文聚焦现有方案在效率、可靠性或工程协同上的瓶颈。方法:摘要显示作者采用建模优化、调度分析或算法评估,把运行负载、冷却/能源系统和基础设施约束放在同一分析框架中。结果:研究重点指向AI 负载波动对电网设备寿命和调频边界的影响。意义:对日报读者而言,它可用于判断智算中心建设是否受电网容量、负载波动和调度机制约束。仍需结合全文实验条件、样本范围和成本假设核验。

参考文献

Jiachen Shen, Jian Shi, Yijie Yang, 等. Grid-Interactive Thermal Management of AI Data Centers via Contextual Distributionally Robust Optimization[J/OL]. (2026-07-01)[2026-07-06]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.00099v1.

Full text 中文海报
算电协同 论文图示
Research Article热管理与液冷

AI Data Centers and the Water Use Feedback Loop

Basit A. Akinade、Amobichukwu C. Amanambu、Jonathan M. Frame、Shaolei Ren

Published 2026-06-20 · arXiv · Credibility S

AI data centres consume water for cooling, water scarcity constrains siting, and AI tools can improve water system efficiency. These dynamics are studied separately yet form a feedback loop. This review formalises the Water and AI Feedback Loop, introduces the Water Consumption Impact index to quantify community-scale utility burden, and demonstrates across ten US sites that burden spans three orders of magnitude, f…

Abstract, interpretation and reference

Abstract

AI data centres consume water for cooling, water scarcity constrains siting, and AI tools can improve water system efficiency. These dynamics are studied separately yet form a feedback loop. This review formalises the Water and AI Feedback Loop, introduces the Water Consumption Impact index to quantify community-scale utility burden, and demonstrates across ten US sites that burden spans three orders of magnitude, from 0.2% to 134% of host capacity.

中文解读

背景:AI 数据中心负载、功率密度和能源约束同步上升,液冷、热管理和数据中心能效正在成为智算中心设计的关键变量。问题:论文聚焦现有方案在效率、可靠性或工程协同上的瓶颈。方法:摘要显示作者采用综述归纳和指标比较,把运行负载、冷却/能源系统和基础设施约束放在同一分析框架中。结果:研究重点指向冷却效率、能源利用或运维策略的改进方向。意义:对日报读者而言,它可用于判断液冷方案、热管理路线和高密度部署节奏。仍需结合全文实验条件、样本范围和成本假设核验。

参考文献

Basit A. Akinade, Amobichukwu C. Amanambu, Jonathan M. Frame, 等. AI Data Centers and the Water Use Feedback Loop[J/OL]. (2026-06-20)[2026-07-06]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21760v1.

Full text 中文海报
热管理与液冷 论文图示
Research Article算电协同

GaN Power Devices and Converter Architectures for AI Data Centers: Efficiency, Reliability, and Deployment Pathways

Donald Intal、Abasifreke Ebong

Published 2026-06-24 · arXiv · Credibility S

The growth of artificial-intelligence workloads is increasing the electrical and thermal demands on data-center power-delivery systems, making conversion efficiency, power density, and reliability critical design priorities. This review examines how gallium-nitride (GaN) power devices can be matched to specific stages of the grid-to-load conversion chain, including power-factor correction, isolated DC/DC conversion,…

Abstract, interpretation and reference

Abstract

The growth of artificial-intelligence workloads is increasing the electrical and thermal demands on data-center power-delivery systems, making conversion efficiency, power density, and reliability critical design priorities. This review examines how gallium-nitride (GaN) power devices can be matched to specific stages of the grid-to-load conversion chain, including power-factor correction, isolated DC/DC conversion, 48-V intermediate-bus conversion, and point-of-load regulation. Si, SiC, and GaN are compared using converter-relevant metrics, and lateral, vertical, and specialized GaN architectures are evaluated in terms of voltage scalability, switching behavior, reverse conduction, thermal pathways, gate control, and technology maturity. The analysis shows that GaN provides a stage-dependent rather than universal advantage. Commercial lateral GaN HEMTs are particularly effective in high-frequency, low-to-mid-voltage stages, while specialized and hybrid devices support bidirectional operation, normally-off control, extreme conversion ratios, and integration. Vertical GaN remains an emerging option for higher-voltage and higher-power conversion. A quantitative framework links cascaded converter efficiency to electrical-loss reduction, cooling demand, annual facility energy use, and operational carbon emissions. Broad deployment further requires low-parasitic packaging, disciplined gate-drive and EMI co-design, mission-profile reliability qualification, scalable manufacturing, and supply-chain resilience. GaN is therefore best treated as a stage-specific system lever whose value depends on coordinated device, topology, package, and thermal co-design.

中文解读

背景:AI 数据中心负载、功率密度和能源约束同步上升,算力负载与电网侧资源的协同调度正在成为智算中心设计的关键变量。问题:论文聚焦现有方案在效率、可靠性或工程协同上的瓶颈。方法:摘要显示作者采用综述归纳和指标比较,把运行负载、冷却/能源系统和基础设施约束放在同一分析框架中。结果:研究重点指向AI 负载波动对电网设备寿命和调频边界的影响。意义:对日报读者而言,它可用于判断智算中心建设是否受电网容量、负载波动和调度机制约束。仍需结合全文实验条件、样本范围和成本假设核验。

参考文献

Donald Intal, Abasifreke Ebong. GaN Power Devices and Converter Architectures for AI Data Centers: Efficiency, Reliability, and Deployment Pathways[J/OL]. (2026-06-24)[2026-07-06]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25281v1.

Full text 中文海报
算电协同 论文图示